At the 2025 United Nations General Assembly, two completely different worldviews stood face to face.
On one side was America’s Donald Trump, who once again raised the slogan “America First” — meaning America above all. In his speech, he sharply attacked immigration, climate policies, and global institutions. His tone was combative — as if he was speaking more to his domestic audience than to the world. He called the UN “useless” and described “globalism” as a threat.
On the other side was India, which presented a more thoughtful and reformist vision.
India emphasized making global institutions more democratic and fair, maintaining its strategic independence, strongly raising the voice of the Global South, and holding countries that shelter terrorism accountable. India’s tone was balanced, but firm on issues like terrorism and trade hypocrisy.
👉 At the ideological level:
Trump’s vision is based on extreme nationalist realism — focusing on power, borders, identity, and self-interest.
India’s vision reflects multipolar reformism — focusing on inclusion, institutional reform, equality, and strategic autonomy.
👉 At the approach level:
Trump imagines a world where each country is locked inside its own “fortress” — less cooperation, more transactional politics.
India talks about reshaping old institutions to fit the modern era, not destroying them.
👉 Strategically:
Trump’s aggressive style may alienate allies and create cracks in the global order.
India’s balanced approach positions it as a “bridge” — especially between the Global South and major powers.
In short:
👉 Trump thundered; India balanced.
One challenged the system, the other talked of reforming it.
This difference shows that the real clash in 21st-century politics is between one-sided nationalism and inclusive multipolarity.
Comments
Post a Comment